| 1 |
Mike Frysinger posted <200504220938.47437.vapier@g.o>, excerpted |
| 2 |
below, on Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:38:47 -0400: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> the idea is to remove 'sash' from our system target and replace it with |
| 5 |
> busybox ... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
That reminds me... I never /was/ able to get sash to compile here (~amd64, |
| 8 |
originally installed as 2004.1, last tried again to compile sash as |
| 9 |
2004.3, IIRC). I finally injected it, and continued on with the emerge |
| 10 |
system... |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Emergency shell? I have a total of four levels of hard drive backup, two |
| 13 |
working and tested snapshots of both my root and /usr partitions, on each |
| 14 |
of two different drives, which also contain independent LILO |
| 15 |
installations, and separate /home partitions (only working and backup |
| 16 |
drive snaps, not four snaps, of each of those). BTW, I've also a total |
| 17 |
of 8 copies of my fstab and partition tables, two each on each of the two |
| 18 |
roots on each drive, in case something happens to my working copies of |
| 19 |
those. If those all fail at once, I suppose I'll be stuck booting from |
| 20 |
LiveCD/DVD, but I hope to beat the odds on that happening. If it does, |
| 21 |
I don't guess much of the system is likely to have survived to be |
| 22 |
usable at all, anyway. =8^O |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
So... I'd say neither one is necessary in the system target. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 28 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 29 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
| 30 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives