1 |
On 12 April 2010 15:22, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse <george.prowse@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote: |
4 |
>>> |
5 |
>>> On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse<george.prowse@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>>> [...] |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong. |
9 |
>>>> Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help |
10 |
>>>> Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habit of Apple-like |
11 |
>>>> litigation when trying to protect it's logo. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> I think the argument is that the wiki is not always accurate, and if |
14 |
>>> perceived as the official documentation, can put is in bad light. |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>> There is *always* a chance of that, official or otherwise |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Which the Wiki team should really be addressing before making a |
19 |
> world-editable wiki. |
20 |
|
21 |
If you're talking about the offical wiki, we are addressing that |
22 |
problem. If you are talking about the unofficial one, I can only |
23 |
agree. |
24 |
|
25 |
Cheers, |
26 |
-- |
27 |
Ben de Groot |
28 |
Gentoo Qt project lead developer |
29 |
Gentoo Wiki project lead |