| 1 |
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:57:39 +0000 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:52:16 -0500 (EST) |
| 5 |
> "Caleb Tennis" <caleb@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > It seems like all source control/revision control programs live in |
| 7 |
> > dev-util, but they might be better served in something like dev-scm |
| 8 |
> > or something like that. I'm thinking things like darcs, git, cvs, |
| 9 |
> > svn, mercurial, bzr. Then the slew of packages that depend on them: |
| 10 |
> > gitosis, bzrtools. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Any objections to this potential move, or comments on a better |
| 13 |
> > category name? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> You might want to ask Seemant (?) why he didn't do the move several |
| 16 |
> years back. There were plans to do it, but it never happened for some |
| 17 |
> reason -- not sure whether it was just a time issue or whether there |
| 18 |
> was something in particular that made it impossible. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
IIRC it was because you argued that cvs didn't qualify |
| 21 |
as a VCS (as the proposed category name back then was app-vcs) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Marius |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives