Archives
Archives
| From: | Luke-Jr <luke-jr@×××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman failing (seemingly) incorrectly | ||
| Date: | Wed, 01 Sep 2004 16:50:25 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200409011650.23351.luke-jr@utopios.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman failing (seemingly) incorrectly by Carsten Lohrke |
||
| 1 | On Wednesday 01 September 2004 1:35 pm, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 2 | > On Wednesday 01 September 2004 14:25, Andrej Kacian wrote: |
| 3 | > > Um, aren't devs supposed to run portage.51 ? |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > I think, there are enough devs, who test it. No need to grill my box. ;) |
| 6 | |
| 7 | .51 also has many new features, IIRC. Maybe the reason isn't for testing, but |
| 8 | because repoman .51 is now neccesary? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman failing (portage 2.0.51_pre is good for the soul) | Travis Tilley <lv@g.o> |