1 |
On 1/9/2005 20:54:14, Stephen P. Becker (geoman@g.o) wrote: |
2 |
> > Is it just me, it seems that only sparc/mips devs want that kind of |
3 |
> > change and non none of the x86/amd64 devs... |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I still dont see what practical advantage that would bring to x86/amd64 |
6 |
> > users or developers? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> If you haven't figured out the reason we are pushing for this sort of |
9 |
> thing yet, it is because x86 is unsupported in Gentoo (if you consider |
10 |
> what all the other arches have to do to be "supported"). As a result, |
11 |
> it causes the quality of the portage tree to suffer. Time and time |
12 |
> again, it has been brought up that x86 should have an arch team, yet |
13 |
> nobody ever acts on it. Well, merging the "two" arches will help solve |
14 |
> this problem. |
15 |
|
16 |
Surely ths solution to that problem is to set up an x86 arch team, not to put such big a millstone around the neck of the amd64 team. |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |