| 1 |
On Wednesday 21 April 2010 14:28:13 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
| 2 |
> - gpg control packet |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On 21-04-2010 04:59, Vincent Launchbury wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On 04/20/10 22:52, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> Hello, |
| 7 |
> >> As suggested in bug 291860, I am heading up an infra cleanup project to |
| 8 |
> >> disable/close some mailing lists. Since the list is quite large, I want |
| 9 |
> >> to send it out for RFC. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Going by archives.gentoo.org stats, the following lists are also |
| 12 |
> > inactive, and are all listed as 'Primary Gentoo Mailing Lists' at |
| 13 |
> > www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > If there's a reason to keep any of them, perhaps they should be split |
| 16 |
> > off to a 'Low-traffic Lists' section, as I can't see them being of much |
| 17 |
> > use to most people. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > gentoo-devrel |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > 2010 - 0 posts |
| 22 |
> > 2009 - 1 post |
| 23 |
> > 2008 - 2 posts |
| 24 |
> > 2007 - 8 posts |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> IIRC, this list was created to promote a way for developers to discuss |
| 27 |
> Developer Relations policies. |
| 28 |
> Even though this is likely to be most of the time a low traffic list, I |
| 29 |
> think it still has merit - unless we chose to promote such discussions |
| 30 |
> on a different "forum". |
| 31 |
Yes but we ( as developers ) tend to handle devrel bugs in a different way. |
| 32 |
That is open bugs and assign it to devrel. INHO this mailing list is useless |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
| 35 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 36 |
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org |
Archives