Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed USE flag: nodoc[Message Scanned]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:14:51
Message-Id: 1075446886.25920.1.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed USE flag: nodoc[Message Scanned] by John Davis
1 On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 02:05, John Davis wrote:
2 > Drake Wyrm wrote:
3 > > Just had an idea for a new USE flag. As a companion to the 'doc' USE flag
4 > > (which installs extra documentation), how about a USE flag which inhibits
5 > > /any/ documentation. This would be highly handy for trimming down a system
6 > > such as a server or router which will never have a warm body sitting in
7 > > front of it after everything is installed and configured. What say ye?
8 > >
9 > Why not put -doc in USE? If the ebuild is specifying docs to install
10 > using the doc USE, doing the above will negate that effect. All that
11 > needs to be done is make more ebuilds conform to it.
12
13 To my knowledge, the use of the "doc" flag has been primarily
14 time-consuming doc creation, or that involving large dependences, such
15 as latex stuff. Not your everyday gzipped README etc.
16
17 Many people prefer things the way "-doc" works now, as they get the
18 necessary docs without all the development stuff, API info, etc.
19
20 Donnie

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature