| 1 |
W dniu pon, 09.07.2018 o godzinie 22∶12 +0200, użytkownik Manuel Rüger |
| 2 |
napisał: |
| 3 |
> On 09.07.2018 10:40, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Hi, |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail addresses |
| 7 |
> > for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of |
| 8 |
> > developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a few |
| 9 |
> > developers are using some other addresses. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Using non-@g.o e-mail addresses generally causes problems |
| 12 |
> > in accounting for commits. For example, our retirement scripts can't |
| 13 |
> > detect commits made using non-Gentoo e-mail address. My dev-timeline |
| 14 |
> > scripts [1] account for all emails in LDAP (which doesn't cover all |
| 15 |
> > addresses developers use). FWIK gkeys accounts for all addresses |
| 16 |
> > in the OpenPGP key UIDs. In my opinion, that's a lot of hoops to jump |
| 17 |
> > through to workaround bad practice. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > Therefore, I'd like to start enforcing (at the level of the hook |
| 20 |
> > verifying signatures) that all commits made to gentoo.git (and other |
| 21 |
> > repositories requiring dev signatures) are made using @gentoo.org e-mail |
| 22 |
> > address (for committer field). |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > Is anyone opposed to that? Does anyone know of a valid reason to use |
| 25 |
> > non-@g.o address when committing? |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > [1]:https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/dev-timeline.html |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Hi Michał, |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> just to be clear on the wording, are you talking about the author email |
| 33 |
> of a git commit (authorship) or the comitter email to the upstream git |
| 34 |
> repository (committer)? |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
«[...] are made using @gentoo.org e-mail address **(for committer |
| 38 |
field)**.» |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
Best regards, |
| 43 |
Michał Górny |
Archives