| 1 |
d'oh! I feel stupid. So it's about 20-25% of the ebuild that use that |
| 2 |
depend on it...still seems kind of low. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Mon, 2003-05-26 at 14:12, Georgi Georgiev wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 26/05/2003 at 13:18:44(-0400), Edward Duffy used 0.8Kbytes just to say: |
| 6 |
> > On the one ebuild I've sumbitted, the dev that committed it added a line |
| 7 |
> > for |
| 8 |
> > DEPEND="virtual/glibc" |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > What wouldn't depend on glibc, isn't that a given? A quick scan |
| 11 |
> > through the portage directory turns up: |
| 12 |
> > # find /usr/portage/ -iname '*.ebuild' | xargs grep "virtual/glibc" |
| 13 |
> > | wc -l |
| 14 |
> > 1982 |
| 15 |
> > # find /usr/portage/ -iname '*.ebuild' | xargs grep -v "virtual/glibc" |
| 16 |
> > | wc -l |
| 17 |
> > 406821 |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> This gives you the number of LINES that do not have virtual/glibc, not the |
| 20 |
> files that don't. You'd want something like: |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> # find /usr/portage -iname '*.ebuild' | xargs -i sh -c 'grep -q "virtual/glibc" {} || echo {}' |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> However, since you already have the number of packages that DO have the line - |
| 25 |
> you only need to substract it from the total number of ebuilds. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> # find /usr/portage -iname '*.ebuild' | wc -l |
| 28 |
> 8587 |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives