| 1 |
On Wednesday 10 April 2013 13:40:17 Fabio Erculiani wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wednesday 10 April 2013 12:42:14 Fabio Erculiani wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> > On Wednesday 10 April 2013 06:04:00 Fabio Erculiani wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> >> It looks like you're not using a standard style guide for Python but |
| 7 |
> >> >> rather this one [1]. |
| 8 |
> >> >> I suggest you to use something closer to PEP8. |
| 9 |
> >> > |
| 10 |
> >> > no |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> Good arguments! As usual I'd say. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > sorry, but i didn't think stating the obvious was necessary. i authored |
| 15 |
> > the entire tool, and the one maintaining the code, so yes, i get the |
| 16 |
> > liberty to use whatever coding style pleases me. you provide no |
| 17 |
> > reasoning whatsoever as to why PEP8 is "better". i doubt the style |
| 18 |
> > choice is going make any difference whatsoever to contributions for |
| 19 |
> > people including yourself. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I guess that you're new to Python then. Anyway, mine was just an |
| 22 |
> advice, yours was just the same old rude answer. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
i guess you haven't actually read the style guides. the differences between |
| 25 |
PEP8 and the Google style guide are minor. anyone who is dissuaded from |
| 26 |
making changes because of those differences most likely isn't going to |
| 27 |
contribute anything useful in the first place. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
people who do the actual work get a say in these things. |
| 30 |
-mike |
Archives