| 1 |
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:43:11 +0200 |
| 2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> El jue, 20-09-2012 a las 02:14 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió: |
| 4 |
> > Revised to use a separate variable for the name of the flag instead |
| 5 |
> > of reading IUSE, as suggested by Ciaran McCreesh. As a result of |
| 6 |
> > this change, vala.eclass now defaults to assuming that vala support |
| 7 |
> > is optional (which is the case in an overwhelming majority of |
| 8 |
> > ebuilds that would want to use this eclass). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Sorry but, why even in_iuse function from eutils.eclass cannot be |
| 11 |
> used? If that is really not allowed, why we have that function in |
| 12 |
> eutils.eclass? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
We had this discussion when the function was introduced. It's supposed |
| 15 |
to be used for cosmetic things only. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives