| 1 |
12.08.2015 22:14, Peter Stuge пишет: |
| 2 |
> May I suggest instead: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> qt? ( |
| 5 |
> qt5? ( dev-lang/qt$something:5 ) |
| 6 |
> qt4? ( dev-lang/qt$something:4 ) |
| 7 |
> ) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
And what would be if USE="qt -qt4 -qt5"? Should we introduce a |
| 10 |
REQUIRED_USE for that? Well, congrats then, USE qt becomes useless, |
| 11 |
cause it does not improve the situation in case of 'at-most-one-of' |
| 12 |
implementation. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
e.g. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
REQUIRED_USE="qt? ( ^^ ( qt4 qt5 ) )" simple shrinked to current |
| 17 |
REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( qt4 qt5 )" |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Again, it's about packages that can not be build with both |
| 20 |
implementations at the same time |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 24 |
Gentoo developer |
| 25 |
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead |
| 26 |
Gentoo Quality Assurance project lead |
| 27 |
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead |
Archives