Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Sam Jorna (wraeth)" <wraeth@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 01:04:44
Message-Id: 4209235.LvFx2qVVIh@nemesis.wraeth.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum by Matt Turner
1 On Saturday, 15 February 2020 3:14:55 AM AEDT Matt Turner wrote:
2 > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:31 AM Sam Jorna (wraeth) <wraeth@g.o>
3 wrote:
4 > > In this instance, at least two people (myself included) have drawn an
5 > > impression that led them to voice their concern in some way (I'm unsure if
6 > > mpagano was voicing concern or just agreeing with the general concept).
7 > > Maybe we're the only ones. Maybe not.
8 >
9 > What do you think the threshold should be? If one person objects,
10 > should ComRel cease and desist? Two? Should we have a Gentoo-wide
11 > vote?
12 >
13 > I don't have the highest opinion of ComRel and I'm a member, but maybe
14 > you could let us do our jobs?
16 I didn't say ComRel shouldn't do their job, nor offered any opinion on ComRel
17 whatsoever. I said people shouldn't be called out on what looks like a
18 legitimate question, and that quote was illustrating one of the reasons why.
19 The threshold I'm talking about would be "is this question, however it's
20 worded, relevant to the subject."
22 Having said that, if this is you wearing a ComRel hat telling me to mind my
23 own business, so be it.
25 --
26 Sam Jorna (wraeth)
27 GnuPG ID: 0xD6180C26


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature