| 1 |
Members of comrel |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
The source of concern with possible violations of CoC source form Bug |
| 4 |
566168, which I know has already been perused by dilfridge. The |
| 5 |
inflammatory tone of the content is self evident. While my comments or |
| 6 |
reply may return their own critique, they always observed the practice |
| 7 |
of focussing on his comments and replies and not the person. In reply, |
| 8 |
he does blatantly accuse the replies as being defamatory. Conclusions / |
| 9 |
judgements of this nature are for you to ascertain. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
In discussion with another developer of the list of members of the |
| 12 |
project, we agreed that the anti-social and troll like responses of |
| 13 |
the user warrant bringing to the attention of comrel for overall |
| 14 |
assessment. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
The main act of offence occurred in fact outside the bug itself. |
| 17 |
The user took the id of the keen user awilfox, sourced the personal |
| 18 |
blog, and entered comments that were in essence, bigotted and |
| 19 |
prejudicial and in today's society frowned upon. These comments will |
| 20 |
have to be lodged separately as a second form of 'evidence'. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
In short, the user concludes that he has been disrespected and implies |
| 23 |
that we cannot work together as a unit, and that he has been wronged, |
| 24 |
apparently some time in the past of which I know nothing. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Please consider this and assess as you see fit. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
kind regards |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Ian Delaney |
Archives