1 |
W dniu nie, 25.02.2018 o godzinie 18∶25 +0900, użytkownik Benda Xu |
2 |
napisał: |
3 |
> Hi Michał, |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> writes: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > > So I would like to hear what you guys think if I: |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > - keep glibc-2.19 and glibc-2.16 in tree and unmasking them in the |
10 |
> > > selected Prefix profiles; |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > - maintain those selected outdated glibc versions on the |
13 |
> > > infrastructure of the Toolchain Project[5]; |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > - (optional) add an exception to the toolchain support policy[6]. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > How about moving them to an overlay? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I have reflected on this option and concluded it is an overkill to |
20 |
> create an overlay for only 1 package. |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
I don't think this is the first old version Prefix team needs keeping. |
24 |
Another example are old versions of LLVM. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Best regards, |
28 |
Michał Górny |