| 1 |
Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 17:21:46 |
| 2 |
Luis Ressel <aranea@×××××.de> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:01:34 +0100 |
| 5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > That's a side goal. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > I was thinking of something like: |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > INSTALL_MASK="linguas -linguas_XX" |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > that would remove all linguas except for language XX. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> That would be enough for me. A bit of a duplication of information, |
| 16 |
> but if it eases the implementation, that shouldn't be much of a problem. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> But imho it'd be nice if this approach didn't require a separate config |
| 19 |
> entry for each language (that'd be 233 entries). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I agree. But I think it's cleaner to have 233 extra files than |
| 22 |
third special case there :). |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
OTOH, we could just make portage use LINGUAS to create implicit |
| 25 |
INSTALL_MASK using directory paths. That wouldn't actually require any |
| 26 |
magic in INSTALL_MASK itself. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Best regards, |
| 30 |
Michał Górny |
Archives