| 1 |
On 03/11/15 06:24, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> The way I see it, keeping review and committing/pushing separate is a |
| 4 |
>> good thing, and removes a lot of the concerns about hosting a review |
| 5 |
>> platform as it is sufficient with read-access to repositories. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Thanks for showing at least one of the alternatives. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> +1. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> FWIW, I think most of the innovation in review UX (insofar as there is |
| 12 |
> any) is happening on ReviewBoard, which is another FOSS review-only |
| 13 |
> tool, written on top of Django. A Python-based app might also be more |
| 14 |
> hackable for the Gentoo dev audience and possibly more |
| 15 |
> security-sensible. I know that Mozilla is starting to deploy it quite |
| 16 |
> successfully. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Cheers, |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Dirkjan |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I'm a big fan of ReviewBoard, and actually set up an instance against |
| 25 |
gx86 a few years ago. Unfortunately there was minimal interest at the |
| 26 |
time, and it seems not a great deal more now. |
Archives