| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 5 |
> Joshua Jackson wrote: |
| 6 |
>> However, as |
| 7 |
>> Chris stated loudly, that this is something that falls directly in |
| 8 |
>> line with Release Engineerings goal. Its not a top level project that |
| 9 |
>> creates something entirely new. Its a extension of the release of |
| 10 |
>> images that allow you to install a system. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Sure, neither is releng creating something entirely new. They're |
| 13 |
> deriving tarballs and CDs using ebuilds to build packages, so perhaps it |
| 14 |
> should be a subproject of the base project. You can make the "not |
| 15 |
> entirely new" argument for literally anything. Oh, and ebuilds wouldn't |
| 16 |
> work without a package manager, so perhaps all of this should fall under |
| 17 |
> the Portage project. But Portage wouldn't exist without people to work |
| 18 |
> on it, so maybe Devrel should be in charge of everything. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
>> Thus in my opinion it being a top level project is to use what someone |
| 21 |
>> else said is ludicrous. |
| 22 |
>> Treecleaners is another newer project that has |
| 23 |
>> spawned and its a subproject of the QA team. Why can't the seeds group |
| 24 |
>> be a part of the Releng group. The entire point of the teams is to |
| 25 |
>> assist each other for a combined benefit. Being a top level project, |
| 26 |
>> you are in essence saying that we want to do this on our own without |
| 27 |
>> the help of a group that has been doing a less focused version of what |
| 28 |
>> you are aiming to provide. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> What I am getting from this is that you do not think people can |
| 31 |
> collaborate if they're not part of the same project. Being a project |
| 32 |
> just says that a group of developers want to work toward a certain goal. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> I encourage everyone to read over |
| 35 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html and look at exactly |
| 36 |
> what a project is. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Thanks, |
| 39 |
> Donnie |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
Oh lovely gross generalization time to use to prove points wrong |
| 42 |
because there isn't any real argument against them *nods* I'm glad |
| 43 |
we've reached this point of the conversation so quickly. It'll mean |
| 44 |
that someone will be calling someone else a member of a certain |
| 45 |
organization that kills all conversations. This is progressing nicely. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
I'm not going to be bothered to reply to the latter as it apparently |
| 48 |
went spacey... |
| 49 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 50 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) |
| 51 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
iD8DBQFFEZvtSENan+PfizARAjdtAJ4hMNcRxRmTZykoVWJb5PflJZ0XEgCfUVKs |
| 54 |
YGp0MDCjYlJKV8GdkO77IH8= |
| 55 |
=YI4J |
| 56 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
-- |
| 59 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives