1 |
Zac Medico wrote: |
2 |
> To simplify things, how about if we just do a |
3 |
> PROPERTIES=live-src-unpack for now, to indicate exclusive access to |
4 |
> $DISTDIR during src_unpack? Thats a simple and portable baseline |
5 |
> that will be quite useful even without anything finer grained. |
6 |
|
7 |
No need for a convoluted and long name like 'live-src-unpack'. Why not |
8 |
keep things simple (how about just 'live'?). You are trying to say it's |
9 |
a 'live' ebuild (i.e. it gets the sources from a live source) - that's |
10 |
all. The locking issues are a technical detail, and there's no need to |
11 |
spell out all aspects of the property in the name; it's just confusing. |
12 |
In fact, you may want to change technical implementation details later, |
13 |
and it would be best not to have left-over details in the name that then |
14 |
would not apply. |
15 |
|
16 |
-Joe |