| 1 |
Michele Noberasco posted <20050629100231.180a07b4@khazad-dum>, excerpted |
| 2 |
below, on Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:02:31 +0200: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:03:59 +0200 |
| 5 |
> "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> imho sys-apps/qingy should also belong here... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> What about kdm and gdm? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Don't know about gdm, but kdm is part of KDE core, kdebase even, and from |
| 12 |
my observations, the KDE herd is pretty keen on keeping all that under |
| 13 |
kde-base, so that's a pretty definite and emphatic NO on it (unless you |
| 14 |
want to take over /all/ of kdebase, and possibly all of kde core, |
| 15 |
everything in kde-base). They want all of kde core kept nice and |
| 16 |
manageable under kde-base, and I don't blame them one bit, considering how |
| 17 |
the tarballs are delivered from upstream. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 21 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 22 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
| 23 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives