Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alexander Gabert <pappy@g.o>
To: stuart@g.o
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] A new 'arches@gentoo.org' alias for bugzilla?
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 09:41:53
Message-Id: 40FF8BE0.8050208@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] A new 'arches@gentoo.org' alias for bugzilla? by Stuart Herbert
1 Stuart Herbert wrote:
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > I've been told that, if I want to get a package marked stable on the other
5 > arches, I have to raise a bug in bugzilla (good), and add the aliases for
6 > each of the individual arches in turn (bad).
7 >
8 > Wouldn't it be much easier if there was a single alias (say) arches@g.o
9 > that these types of bug could be assigned to?
10 >
11 > Best regards,
12 > Stu
13 good idea, but i think arches@g.o should be an alias to the
14 responsible arch maintainers rather than the groups themselves (too
15 crowded sometimes)
16
17 you could also make it "arch-keywording"@gentoo.org
18
19 But being as mnemonic(?sp) as possible, arches@g.o is just fine i
20 think.
21
22 And put a big sign on the HP and the usual developer manuals for
23 beginners to "stumble upon" that info ASAP when beginning to work in
24 portage.
25
26 Thanks,
27
28 Alex
29
30 --
31 Chaos is just a perceptional disorder of reality.
32
33 --
34 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] A new 'arches@gentoo.org' alias for bugzilla? Jeremy Huddleston <eradicator@g.o>