1 |
On Friday 29 April 2005 07:28, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> My problem with it is that Joe User, who doesn't do ebuilds, will change |
3 |
> his USE flags and recompile an entire package just to get a little |
4 |
> logrotate file that has nothing to do with the source of the package |
5 |
> itself. This waste of time is pointless, which is why I call the USE |
6 |
> flag dumb. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I'd prefer to have some package that's just a collection of logrotate |
9 |
> files for a ton of packages, if there's some reason a ~400-byte file is |
10 |
> just killing your system. Or a separate package for each file. Doesn't |
11 |
> matter to me. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> In fact, I've thought many times about supplying "pre-packages" that are |
14 |
> no more than a collection of all the config files for a given package. |
15 |
|
16 |
What about the unused `ebuild [ebuild] config`? Isn't that the perfect place |
17 |
for this sort of stuff? The only package that I know that uses this feature |
18 |
is mysql. There are way more possibilities. |
19 |
|
20 |
> > As an aside, my preference would be to install them by default, but |
21 |
> > allow a nologrotate equivalent to "nodoc", "noinfo", or "noman". That |
22 |
> > would require hacking portage, though, which seems silly for something |
23 |
> > so trivial. Does anybody remember why we chose "nodoc", "noinfo", and |
24 |
> > "noman" instead of a generic INSTALL_MASK="/usr/share/doc |
25 |
> > /usr/share/man ..." flag which could be more general? |
26 |
|
27 |
> There does appear to also be an INSTALL_MASK. I just grepped |
28 |
> /usr/lib/portage for it. |
29 |
|
30 |
Iggy's (is that his real name?) request. |
31 |
|
32 |
Regards, |
33 |
Jason Stubbs |
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |