1 |
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:54:20 -0500 Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
| Azarah wrote:[Mon Mar 07 2005, 11:57:04AM EST] |
4 |
| > Also the problem is that especially if you have a rapid changing |
5 |
| > package, where the patches changes a lot, putting it in distfiles is |
6 |
| > a pita, as you have to scp it, then wait an hour to 3 depending on |
7 |
| > how lucky you are, and then only commit. |
8 |
| |
9 |
| I know this has been covered before, but what is the problem with |
10 |
| putting files on dev.gentoo.org? The automatic scripts should suck it |
11 |
| into distfiles and portage should check mirrors before "upstream" (in |
12 |
| this case dgo) first, so I'd think the load on dgo shouldn't be |
13 |
| significant. |
14 |
|
15 |
Infra have politely (where by politely I mean "with threats of |
16 |
decapitation and feeding to the goats") asked us not to do this because |
17 |
of reliability and load issues. I'd say that they probably know best... |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools) |
21 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
22 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |