| 1 |
On Sunday 15 January 2006 19:54, George Shapovalov wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ok, I got the answer from upstream and, as I expected, 2005 refers to the |
| 3 |
> language specification and is not a release version. Upstream in fact is |
| 4 |
> undecided at this point on what naming/versioning scheme it is going to |
| 5 |
> use, so we need to come up with something.. Then 3.4.5.1 seems as good to |
| 6 |
> me as 2005, probably even better (than the latter) since it is more |
| 7 |
> descriptive (and is in fact easier to follow technically). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Alternatively, if you use something low like 0.0_pre20050124, the upgrade path |
| 10 |
to whatever version name is chosen is easy and uncumbersome. Of course don't |
| 11 |
do this if it's likely to be years for a proper version to be chosen. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Paul |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 17 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 18 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 19 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives