Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | ||
| Date: | Sun, 06 May 2007 20:26:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070506212244.3ad2931a@snowflake | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade by Dan Meltzer |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 6 May 2007 16:13:56 -0400 |
| 2 | Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > > So you want users to have to explicitly acknowledge all ewarn |
| 4 | > > notices? Now *that*'s a way of making the system useless by |
| 5 | > > overusing it. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Err, warn notices are supposed to be important warnings. If they are |
| 8 | > not it sounds like a good job for QA. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | That's a completely different degree of importance. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> |