From: | Lisa Seelye <lisa@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> |
Cc: | lisa@g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Should significant changes to arch be posted to -announce mail list? |
Date: | Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:10:34 |
Message-Id: | 1094227795.20758.37.camel@lisa.thedoh.com |
1 | I think they should. Having new blockers come up on an arch box when |
2 | attempting to update is a little worrysome. Or having a new way of |
3 | doing things (such as the inevitable move to udev in lieu of devfs). |
4 | |
5 | The things that I would hope to see in such an announcement would be a |
6 | suitable upgrade path, reason for change, and a link to gentoo-dev |
7 | discussion if available. |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Regards, |
13 | Lisa Seelye |
14 | Key fingerprint = 09CF 52D6 B82B 72B9 97A7 601B CB46 B556 1E49 6FC5 |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should significant changes to arch be posted to -announce mail list? | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Should significant changes to arch be posted to -announce mail list? | Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o> |