1 |
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 00:08 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 15:31 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 21:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:05:09 +0100 Maurice van der Pot |
5 |
> > > <griffon26@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > > | For instance, checking (for all arches, for all use flag combos) if |
7 |
> > > | the dependencies are as stable or more stable (x86 > ~x86 > hard |
8 |
> > > | masked) than the thing depending on it. |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > Hasn't repoman been doing this correctly for a year or more now? I know |
11 |
> > > it wasn't the case when I joined, but bug 24160 is long fixed... |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > What if we had a service that did this check plus other stuff repoman |
14 |
> > doesn't count and report it to some web site that developers can look at |
15 |
> > daily to see QA bugs? Maybe run it daily or every 6-12 hours? I think |
16 |
> > someone mentioned something like that once. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I think it would be worth a lot more if it was mailed to the maintainer |
20 |
> of the ebuild (and perhaps QA?), as it takes time and effort to wade |
21 |
> through a list (like the been in ~ for x days list that we used to get). |
22 |
|
23 |
How about both options? Some people prefer getting email reports, others |
24 |
prefer just going to a website. I don't see how this could be a problem, |
25 |
so why not offer both? :) Perhaps we should ask the author to rewrite |
26 |
his proposed GLEP to be more of a QA monitoring system that devs could |
27 |
use. |
28 |
|
29 |
Just my random thoughts... |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> |
33 |
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager |
34 |
|
35 |
--- |
36 |
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> |
37 |
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 |
38 |
|
39 |
ramereth/irc.freenode.net |