1 |
В Втр, 17/05/2011 в 20:43 +0200, Ângelo Arrifano пишет: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 20:28:56 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
3 |
> > I'd add that if we want /run to be on tmpfs, /var/run and /tmp should |
4 |
> > both be on tmpfs by default. I've been doing this manually for a year, |
5 |
> > and so have other distributions. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> The lwn article is definitely interesting to read, I welcome the new /run. I |
8 |
> wouldn't make /tmp as tmpfs though, there are some packages (wireshask I'm |
9 |
> looking at you) that can fill the directory fairly easy. |
10 |
|
11 |
Hm, may be I miss something... but how wireshark fills /run? As far as I |
12 |
see dumps go into /tmp. |
13 |
|
14 |
-- |
15 |
Peter. |