| 1 |
I can't think of any. Most/All source packages attempt to install in |
| 2 |
/usr/local. That's why /usr has to be specified. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
-Jared H. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Sean Mitchell wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>>From: Jared H. Hudson [mailto:jhhudso@××××××××××.com] |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>>>>A lot of ebuilds are written with the premise that the |
| 12 |
>>>>stuff goes into /usr, and have it hard coded. :( Even |
| 13 |
>>>>if portage starts supporting |
| 14 |
>>>>custom prefixes, a huge ebuild cleanup effort would be required, as |
| 15 |
>>>>far as I understand. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>>>What's the alternative to something like |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> make prefix=${D}/usr mandir=${D}/usr/share/man install || die |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>>>then? Is there a better way? |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
>>./configure --prefix=${D}/usr mandir=${D}/usr/share/man || die |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> No, you miss my point.... what's the alternative to hardcoding /usr? |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Cheers, |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Sean |
| 33 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 34 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 35 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 36 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives