| 1 |
On 14/01/2013 18:32, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ah, right! So, those packages also need to be patched to use /run |
| 3 |
> directly, instead of relying on the symlink. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Or the symlink should just stay for however long that's going to take, |
| 6 |
which is probably a good idea, as it does not bother anyone. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I don't think that's going to be a problem for running systems though: |
| 9 |
the symlink will never be entirely empty. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 13 |
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
Archives