Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: per package eclass GLEP
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:07:57
Message-Id: 201009192250.10739.dilfridge@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] RFC: per package eclass GLEP by Matti Bickel
1 Wouldn't it also make sense to have "per-category eclasses"? This seems much more useful for me.
2
3 Examples where this would already make sense today: kde-meta, latex-package, ...
4
5 Best, Andreas
6
7 On Sunday 19 September 2010 21:14:56 Matti Bickel wrote:
8 > I'm a couple weeks late with this, but here goes:
9 > from my failed attempts at reviving GLEP33 grow a discussion with
10 > ferringb on IRC about how to get what I wanted anyway :)
11 >
12 > We agreed that having eclasses specific to a package located someplace
13 > near the actual ebuilds was beneficial and should be supported by PMs
14 > somehow. Someplace and somehow are specified along some other details in
15 > the attached proposed GLEP.
16 >
17 > I'm posting this for review by the wider community, at the same time
18 > asking the GLEP editors (antarus? pva?) for guidance on the formalities.
19 > I gather the GLEP should get a number and be uploaded in CVS somewhere,
20 > as well as appear on the GLEP project page.
21 >
22 > So, yeah, what do you think? Is it worth it? Can the draft be improved?
23 > I'm specifically interested in the amount of work involved in supporting
24 > something like the thing laid out in the GLEP in our current PMs.
25 >
26
27 --
28 Andreas K. Huettel
29 Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, sunrise
30 dilfridge@g.o
31 http://www.akhuettel.de/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: per package eclass GLEP Matti Bickel <mabi@g.o>