1 |
Wouldn't it also make sense to have "per-category eclasses"? This seems much more useful for me. |
2 |
|
3 |
Examples where this would already make sense today: kde-meta, latex-package, ... |
4 |
|
5 |
Best, Andreas |
6 |
|
7 |
On Sunday 19 September 2010 21:14:56 Matti Bickel wrote: |
8 |
> I'm a couple weeks late with this, but here goes: |
9 |
> from my failed attempts at reviving GLEP33 grow a discussion with |
10 |
> ferringb on IRC about how to get what I wanted anyway :) |
11 |
> |
12 |
> We agreed that having eclasses specific to a package located someplace |
13 |
> near the actual ebuilds was beneficial and should be supported by PMs |
14 |
> somehow. Someplace and somehow are specified along some other details in |
15 |
> the attached proposed GLEP. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I'm posting this for review by the wider community, at the same time |
18 |
> asking the GLEP editors (antarus? pva?) for guidance on the formalities. |
19 |
> I gather the GLEP should get a number and be uploaded in CVS somewhere, |
20 |
> as well as appear on the GLEP project page. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> So, yeah, what do you think? Is it worth it? Can the draft be improved? |
23 |
> I'm specifically interested in the amount of work involved in supporting |
24 |
> something like the thing laid out in the GLEP in our current PMs. |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
29 |
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, sunrise |
30 |
dilfridge@g.o |
31 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |