| 1 |
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:39:01 +0200 |
| 2 |
Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:29:06 +0200 |
| 5 |
> Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Is it time yet? I still find a lot of packages that do not even respect |
| 8 |
> LDFLAGS yet - when all these get fixed to respect LDFLAGS, we will |
| 9 |
> probably find yet more packages that are problematic with --as-needed. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
When you fix those packages to respect LDFLAGS you'll already hit any |
| 12 |
as-needed issues that might exist since it's on by default in the dev |
| 13 |
profiles. Enabling it in the user profiles doesn't change that. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
fonts, gcc-porting, and it's all by design |
| 18 |
toolchain, wxwidgets to keep us from losing our minds |
| 19 |
@ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives