| 1 |
On Sunday 17 January 2010 17:12:27 Thilo Bangert wrote: |
| 2 |
> Sebastian Pipping [snip] said: |
| 3 |
> [snip] |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > i chose maintainer-wanted to indicate that co-maintainers and |
| 6 |
> > non-maintainer-bumps are welcome. what valid means can i use to send |
| 7 |
> > such a message, instead? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> i dont know of any. i generally assume all packages are looking for more |
| 10 |
> maintainers, but that assumption may be as invalid as yours (having |
| 11 |
> maintainer-wanted@g.o as <maintainer> in metadata.xml to indicate |
| 12 |
> the above). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
ive seen people use a <description> tag in their maintainer tag with basically |
| 15 |
"feel free to make changes to this" |
| 16 |
-mike |
Archives