1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:42:08 -0700
|
5 |
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
|
6 |
|
7 |
> On 16:11 Wed 26 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote: |
8 |
> > On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
9 |
> > > Joe Peterson <lavajoe@g.o>: |
10 |
> > > > Thanks for the tip. I added "failed to install genlop (via dobin)" - |
11 |
> > > > not sure if there is a standard way to do this, as it seems many |
12 |
> > > > ebuilds just do "dobin failed", and some do "failed to install ...". |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > > It is mainly to localise which die command caused the halt. So I know |
15 |
> > > of no standard. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > if there is just one call to die in a function, then i usually dont bother ... |
18 |
> > but if there are multiple ones (possibly nested), then it can easily save |
19 |
> > time |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Cardoe was just telling me that die messages are not that useful or |
22 |
> time-saving because portage posts the line number of the failure |
23 |
> already. That prompts the question, should we get rid of die messages? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Thanks, |
26 |
> Donnie |
27 |
|
28 |
No. They might contain useful information. Just the line
|
29 |
number of the failure is just frustrating: You don't really
|
30 |
necessarily know what went wrong, and you have to go read the ebuild to
|
31 |
find out. Users might not appreciate that.
|
32 |
> -- |
33 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
34 |
> |
35 |
Regards,
|
36 |
|
37 |
- --
|
38 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
|
39 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel)
|
40 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
41 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
|
42 |
|
43 |
iD8DBQFG+sspQa6M3+I///cRAr1QAJ9e1rGHNFBavGgR7pIxr1Xzaw12GgCg4lAK
|
44 |
k5/iP9fH0kcmYlBdjTKcYrY=
|
45 |
=BEej
|
46 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
47 |
éí¢‡^¾§¶Š(® šŠX§‚X¬ |