| 1 |
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 19:18:41 +0200 |
| 2 |
Maurice van der Pot <griffon26@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> What's the definition of a "non-arch dev"? Is it a dev not in an arch |
| 5 |
> team? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
That would be my understanding. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> And the final paragraph: |
| 10 |
> "Ciaranm and weeve have noted that it is occasionally necessary for |
| 11 |
> arch teams to override a package maintainer when it comes to stabling |
| 12 |
> a package. Stuart has asserted that in those cases the arch team |
| 13 |
> should be willing to take on the support burden for that package." |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Overriding here means stabling before the maintainer does it, not |
| 16 |
> keeping it in unstable while the maintainer wants to mark it stable, |
| 17 |
> right? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Mostly us needing to stabilize sooner, but in some cases the opposite is |
| 20 |
true as well (for instance cases where it works for some but not |
| 21 |
others). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Cheers, |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Jason Wever |
| 26 |
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead |
Archives