Archives
Archives
| From: | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | zmedico@g.o, mgorny@g.o, ulm@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: go 1.13 and go modules | ||
| Date: | Mon, 09 Sep 2019 18:41:16 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20190909184107.GA31538@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: go 1.13 and go modules by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:19:02AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 | > On 9/9/19 10:34 AM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > > There is another option I want to try which is adding "go mod vendor" to |
| 5 | > > src_unpack for go packages. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > If you do that then it will violate FEATURES=network-sandbox (default) |
| 8 | > unless you also do PROPERTIES+=" live". |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > We could add a separate PROPERTIES value for this, I've suggested it |
| 11 | > before but both Michał Górny and Ulrich Mueller were against it: |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage-dev/message/6d696661b29b6e2b8c82061e89e4718f |
| 14 | |
| 15 | If checksum verification is the concern, Go 1.13 also has this: |
| 16 | |
| 17 | https://blog.golang.org/module-mirror-launch |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Thoughts? Does this make the case for a property for these kinds of |
| 20 | ebuilds? |
| 21 | |
| 22 | William |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: go 1.13 and go modules | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |