| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 08/28/2012 04:54 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I meant 'require only newest slot supported by package' vs 'any |
| 7 |
> older slot would work'. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
hmm, imo that depends on the question if we can safely assume that the |
| 11 |
application compiles with boost 1.35.0 up to 1.48.0 when we set |
| 12 |
BOOST_MAX_SLOT=1.48 |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
otherwise we would end up supporting a range of slots which seems |
| 15 |
unneccessary, no? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Maybe we should rather do something like |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
WANT_BOOST=${WANT_BOOST:-1.48} |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
which will force the dependencies and the rest, but the user will |
| 22 |
still be able to handle this per-package through /etc/portage/env if |
| 23 |
he sees fit. |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQPdq3AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzh4YIAJzjACoHfQCQ1a8fUIxcMNw4 |
| 29 |
Y2rknN/BR9ZdGWLL3+JqnAXGHJLgufOXPJuDtobUQdVWmZeyYgXdbO89FKFRjQPR |
| 30 |
/bHio0DWppeJLAMHpyYtHJy5TSmsQU8V7075riCBGmq5cQLblLey+vdDKavONSm5 |
| 31 |
WUjvkTxiaaiOs5VIOOzY5951UU4WH9CHpICr73sqY9A3ll/A32+uH2HjrsLV1LiV |
| 32 |
lPjdXVnM/KQ2QSQ5E9BID17JBiI2Pvbd6u4BdzCNIcB/3by4D0gwgph9hihKrbky |
| 33 |
FR/uF80jiF2ySE/AedZT2wvp32Vhs5Nsqhbsp0KuaN7WAge7qbxv7VccqzetpN0= |
| 34 |
=kjd7 |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives