1 |
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:51:54 -0400 |
2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> On Friday 30 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
> > Gentoo's lack of progress is an extremely relevant issue... |
5 |
> |
6 |
> dont push your own agendas under the guise that Gentoo is lacking |
7 |
> progress |
8 |
|
9 |
Don't push your own agenda under the guise that it isn't. |
10 |
|
11 |
> - you are not wanted as an official Gentoo developer ... the past |
12 |
> clearly shows this |
13 |
|
14 |
Not really... The process by which I became an unofficial Gentoo |
15 |
developer was so flawed that it got replaced as a result... |
16 |
|
17 |
> - the official package manager of Gentoo would need to be |
18 |
> completely "in-house" with respect to control, direction, etc... |
19 |
|
20 |
Justify that. What does being in-house have to do with having control? |
21 |
Are you claiming that if the Council asks for a feature to be added to |
22 |
Portage that it will be added, or that if the Council asks for a |
23 |
feature to be added to Paludis that it wouldn't? |
24 |
|
25 |
> - "in-house" would require every one who is control of the package |
26 |
> manager to be a Gentoo developer |
27 |
|
28 |
If that were true, you might want to consider the number of Gentoo |
29 |
developers working on each of the three... |
30 |
|
31 |
> - in order for you to gain @gentoo.org again, we'd need either a |
32 |
> complete flush of developer blood who would accept you or you to |
33 |
> change yourself ... neither of which are realistic |
34 |
|
35 |
You're assuming that the majority of developers had anything to do with |
36 |
or cared remotely about any of that. But first and foremost, you missed |
37 |
the part about me *wanting* to gain an @gentoo.org address, which isn't |
38 |
going to happen so long as the disadvantages outweigh whatever gain |
39 |
it's supposed to give... |
40 |
|
41 |
> so let's put this all together shall we: |
42 |
> you are in full control of paludis, you will not be a Gentoo |
43 |
> developer, thereforce paludis will not be the official Gentoo package |
44 |
> manager |
45 |
|
46 |
By that logic, Linux can't be the official Gentoo kernel and GCC can't |
47 |
be the official Gentoo compiler, which is clearly silly. |
48 |
|
49 |
> > No no, I'd be quite happy with any package manager that meets my |
50 |
> > needs and the needs of other people. Portage is not such a package |
51 |
> > manager, and, let's face it, never will be. The continuing |
52 |
> > delusion that Portage will somehow magically improve and allow |
53 |
> > Gentoo to keep up with other distributions is largely why Gentoo is |
54 |
> > stuck where it is. |
55 |
> |
56 |
> there's a magic pill if i ever saw one ... the only available package |
57 |
> managers at the moment that satisfy your requirements is paludis ... |
58 |
> therefore see previous statements |
59 |
|
60 |
*shrug* That's hardly my fault, is it? |
61 |
|
62 |
> > As you also know fine well, those requirements |
63 |
> > mean Gentoo will permanently be stuck with Portage (and when |
64 |
> > dreaming up silly and biased requirements, bear in mind that |
65 |
> > Portage was at one point close to being moved off Gentoo |
66 |
> > infrastructure because of the huge delays in setting up svn...). |
67 |
> |
68 |
> again, wrong ... read what i said, my requirements would control |
69 |
> selection of an official package manager and in fact are quite |
70 |
> general and dont really come with restrictions as you seem to think |
71 |
|
72 |
No, it just so happens that they deliberately exclude the only two |
73 |
current viable alternatives to Portage, and experience suggests that |
74 |
it's going to take a substantial amount of time for anyone to come |
75 |
up with a third one... |
76 |
|
77 |
> "emerge" is a brand name for Gentoo and while you can complain about |
78 |
> lack of features all you want, dropping portage and installing a |
79 |
> different package manager with a completely different interface will |
80 |
> surely causes a huge pita for everyone |
81 |
|
82 |
In the same way that "dselect" is a brand name for Debian? |
83 |
|
84 |
-- |
85 |
Ciaran McCreesh |