| 1 |
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:32:12 +0200 |
| 2 |
Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> mgorny opened up a bug[1], which requests for all eclasses that use |
| 5 |
> the 'prefix' USE-flag to be "fixed" to add 'prefix' to IUSE. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Please do not suggest that I am the one requesting this to be "fixed". |
| 8 |
I just have opened the bug because Ciaran failed to do that aside to |
| 9 |
complaining on the new eclasses on mailing list. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> For all currently Council approved EAPIs this means 'prefix' has to be |
| 12 |
> added to IUSE. While said bug[1] is assigned to the prefix team, I |
| 13 |
> feel this is actually for the coordinating role, since prefix does |
| 14 |
> not own most of the ebuilds/eclasses that would need changes. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
To be more exact, I just wanted the Prefix team to decide on how we |
| 17 |
should go with it, and how should new eclasses use the prefix flag. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433894 |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Best regards, |
| 23 |
Michał Górny |
Archives