| 1 |
On 2016-01-17 19:18, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
| 2 |
> Second attempt! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> === |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Title: Upgrading Apache from 2.2 to 2.4 |
| 7 |
> Author: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> |
| 8 |
> Content-Type: text/plain |
| 9 |
> Posted: 2016-01-17 |
| 10 |
> Revision: 1 |
| 11 |
> News-Item-Format: 1.0 |
| 12 |
> Display-If-Installed: www-servers/apache |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> With the 2.4 branch released by upstream almost 4 years ago, stable |
| 15 |
> Gentoo systems will soon be upgraded from apache 2.2 to apache 2.4. |
| 16 |
> When upgrading, chances are some configuration changes have to be |
| 17 |
> made. Upstream has a handy guide: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> For more information on all the new features, start here: |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/new_features_2_4.html |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> === |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> A bit more concise and less personal. Better? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Cheers, |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Dirkjan |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
I think the use of "chances" here depresses the importance of |
| 35 |
configuration changes. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
This is debatable, but I think it should be "there are some |
| 38 |
configuration changes that must be made." |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Primarily in regards to the Order directive being (re)moved to an |
| 41 |
optional module. |
Archives