| 1 |
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 09:22:04AM +0200, George Shapovalov wrote: |
| 2 |
> ????????????, 21. ?????????????? 2006 01:05, malverian@g.o ???? ????????????????: |
| 3 |
> [...] |
| 4 |
> > I'm writing to ask for your opinion on a change to sys-apps/portage that |
| 5 |
> > would allow users to maintain local revisions of ebuilds, such as |
| 6 |
> > "net-www/apache-2.0.58-r2-local1". |
| 7 |
> [...] |
| 8 |
> Um, I am not clear on what exactly your approach proposes that is not already |
| 9 |
> available via just using a local portage overlay? From the description or |
| 10 |
> cited cases this seems to be exactly this feature, or am I missing something? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
You are missing something. The point of a local revision number is that |
| 14 |
it would allow an actual version bump so the package is seen as an |
| 15 |
upgrade. If you read the detailed explanation of #3, you can see why |
| 16 |
this is useful. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> George |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> -- |
| 22 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives