1 |
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:28:49AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote |
2 |
|
3 |
> However, my whole point wasn't to throw stones at the chromium team - |
4 |
> I think that they've been doing a great job of fixing this problem, |
5 |
> and will continue to do so. I just was pointing out that Google's |
6 |
> practice of bundling dependencies wasn't to my liking, but that I |
7 |
> wasn't going to give them too much of a hard time precisely because |
8 |
> I'm not being part of the solution. |
9 |
|
10 |
I think Chromium's problem is that it's based on Chrome. And Google |
11 |
is "pulling an AOL" by trying to turn Chrome into an OS for its |
12 |
Chromebooks. To paraphrase the old emacs joke... Chrom(e/ium) is a |
13 |
mediocre OS that lacks a lightweight web browser. I just did a |
14 |
"pretend" build for Chromium. I fail to understand why a *WEB BROWSER* |
15 |
needs elfutils and dbus and udev as hard-coded dependancies. The udev |
16 |
dependancy is a show stopper for me, as I've migrated over to mdev. See |
17 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mdev That page is now mostly other |
18 |
people's contributions. I was the rabble-rouser who started it. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |