Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:24:21
Message-Id: 201106281220.57634.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml by Peter Volkov
On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 08:02:03 Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Сбт, 25/06/2011 в 13:24 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет: > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: > > >> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be > > >> indented? Tabs or n spaces? > > > > > > There's no rule, but we should follow the same rule as ebuilds — > > > indentation should be with a tab that's displayed as 4 spaces in > > > editors (no expansion of tabs to spaces). > > > > meh ... let devs do whatever they want > > Why? This looks like perfect case to use standard indentation. > Personally I'd like indentation to be fixed (and I don't really care > how).
these files are so small/minor, and now we tread into xml territory which has much less standardized indenting and line wrapping rules. it isnt simply a matter of "how much space do i put before an open tag". i really dont see it being a "problem" that needs "solving". -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature