Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla etiquette suggestions
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 04:09:40
Message-Id: 1139803619.9729.86.camel@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla etiquette suggestions by Daniel Drake
1 Thank you for taking the time to put preXX doc this mail together.
2
3 I find it personally inspiring and a reminder to watch how I/we handle
4 bugs which is often easy to overlook.
5
6
7
8
9 On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 21:11 +0000, Daniel Drake wrote:
10 > I wrote most of this a while ago but didn't get round to finishing it.
11 > This seems appropriate at this time, so here it is :)
12 >
13 > Here are some small *suggestions* for how I think we can motivate users
14 > on Bugzilla to contribute more, and to contribute more often. I'm not
15 > suggesting this be enforced as policy, but it would be nice to see other
16 > developers giving this some thought. I'm far from perfect here, but I am
17 > working on sticking to my own suggestions more and more.
18 >
19 > Remember that Bugzilla is the only way we communicate with most of our
20 > external contributors so it is important to make them feel appreciated
21 > and give them a good impression of the Gentoo developer community.
22 >
23 > 1. Don't bitch at contributors
24 >
25 > Even if they did something totally wrong, violated all known policies,
26 > and you are *sure* they just filed the bug to annoy you, don't write
27 > aggressive sounding responses.
28 >
29 > Reasons being:
30 > - You'll reduce the chances they'll think about contributing again in
31 > the future
32 > - They probably won't listen to a word you say, yet will feel the need
33 > to respond
34 > - Bugzilla is a public medium, and other potential contributors (who
35 > maybe wouldn't have made such 'obvious' mistakes) will be put off when
36 > reading the aggressive dialog.
37 > (I'm not suggesting that you send abuse privately instead!)
38 > - Like we aren't paid to fix bugs, the users aren't paid to file them:
39 > at the end of the day, someone went out of his/her way to file the bug,
40 > to try and help.
41 >
42 > 2. Be careful with INVALID resolutions
43 >
44 > The term invalid _is_ harsh in bugzilla context, so make sure you write
45 > a quick thankful-sounding comment to go with it.
46 >
47 > Maybe we should consider alternatives. I quite like the NOTABUG
48 > resolution they have on the GNOME bugzilla.
49 >
50 > Marking bugs as duplicates is also dodgy ground: Comments like "Please
51 > search" can easily be taken the wrong way. I'm probably asking too much
52 > for people to spend lots of time thinking up appreciative duplicate
53 > messages, however...
54 >
55 > 3. Always record contributions by name
56 >
57 > If you commit something in response to a bug report that has been filed,
58 > always thank the user by full name (and bug number) in the ChangeLog and
59 > commit message.
60 >
61 > Do the above even if you already knew about the bug (i.e. you would have
62 > committed the same fix even if the user hadn't alerted you).
63 >
64 > This also applies for ebuild requests, ebuild submissions, and version
65 > bump requests/submissions. Might sound pointless for 'trivial'
66 > reports/requests but it is important to credit the user if they have
67 > gone to the trouble of filing a bug.
68 >
69 > This also applies to contributors who you know well, contributors who
70 > you have named 9999 times before, and other Gentoo developers too.
71 >
72 > 4. Give the user a chance to make minor corrections
73 >
74 > If a user contributes a patch/ebuild which is slightly wrong, and the
75 > issue is non-critical, don't immediately correct it on their behalf and
76 > commit it to get the bug out of the way.
77 >
78 > Instead, provide an explanation of their mistake and give the user a day
79 > or two to correct it and attach an updated version. This has the bonuses
80 > that the user definately won't repeat that mistake in future
81 > contributions, and they will have the nice feeling of full credit for
82 > the contribution after you name them in the ChangeLog :)
83 >
84 > If they don't respond in that time, make the correction yourself and
85 > commit it anyway.
86 >
87 > 5. Be thankful when marking FIXED
88 >
89 > When marking a bug as FIXED, I often forget that the user has tested 4
90 > kernel versions, moved their network card over to another computer,
91 > filed an identical bug report upstream, tested the solution, and
92 > reported back to me.
93 >
94 > I think a short note of thanks in the bugzilla comment can go a long way
95 > (suggestion: thank them for something in particular so that it doesn't
96 > sound so generic).
97 >
98 > 6. Don't forget about email
99 >
100 > As a Gentoo developer, you have been automatically granted the ability
101 > to sound important and make others feel important too.
102 >
103 > When Seemant mailed me over 2 years ago, I was a relative idiot and was
104 > a new Gentoo user at that time. It felt great to receive a complimentary
105 > email from a well-known and respected Gentoo developer, and that email
106 > eventually led to me becoming a developer myself (amongst other things!).
107 >
108 > I've had the same kind of effect on people since then, for example, I
109 > sent a very quick "thanks" mail to the guy who authored the wordpress
110 > theme I run on my weblog, and he was overjoyed that I was using it - he
111 > happened to be a Gentoo user who already read my blog via the Planet site.
112 >
113 > There probably aren't many situations where you would email a user who
114 > communicates with you on bugzilla. But don't forget about this nice
115 > ability that we have :)
116 >
117 >
118 >
119 > That's all I can think of for now. I'd certainly be interested to hear
120 > any comments on the above and similar suggestions that others may have.
121 >
122 > Daniel
123 --
124 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
125 Gentoo Linux
126
127 --
128 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla etiquette suggestions Shyam Mani <fox2mike@g.o>