1 |
El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 23:45 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
2 |
> On 23/01/13 23:21, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
3 |
> > El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 15:14 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
4 |
> >> please review this news item, seems we need one after all |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Why don't you drop "~" from: |
7 |
> > CONFIG_CHECK="~DEVTMPFS" |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > to ensure people really changes it in their kernel and prevent breakage? |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> |
12 |
> That won't work because the host you run the package isn't necessarily |
13 |
> same as the one you are building it on |
14 |
> The build host doesn't need DEVTMPFS |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
And couldn't that be done at install time? I mean, you can build and |
19 |
package new udev but installation will die if udev is going to be |
20 |
installed on a system without DEVTMPFS |