Archives
Archives
| From: | Justin <jlec@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] About gcc-4.6 unmasking | ||
| Date: | Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:42:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4F42B00C.4050603@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] About gcc-4.6 unmasking by Pacho Ramos |
||
| 1 | On 20.02.2012 21:34, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 | > I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are |
| 3 | > preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near |
| 4 | > stabilization)? |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for |
| 7 | > testing purposes :-/ |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > Thanks a lot for the info |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Here was the last one |
| 12 | |
| 13 | http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_b6db68b41a4b318ea2122fb982c10dfb.xml |
| 14 | |
| 15 | For me it worked fine for months now. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | justin |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] About gcc-4.6 unmasking | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |