Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: why is net.eth0 started, even though it's not in any runlevel?
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 06:48:23
Message-Id: 200610230746.05779.uberlord@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: why is net.eth0 started, even though it's not in any runlevel? by "Sven Köhler"
1 On Monday 23 October 2006 03:37, Sven Köhler wrote:
2 > i see, another sollution could be:
3 >
4 > instead of having tweo states per service and runlevel (enabled,
5 > disabled), gentoo could introduce a tristate-logic:
6 >
7 > services can be disabled, enabled or they can be set to auto.
8 >
9 > These states have the following meaning:
10 > disabled: the service does not start and will not be started by any
11 > hot/coldplugging
12 > enabled: the service is started on boot (and maybe not by hot/cludplugging)
13 > auto: the service started by hot/coldplugging things
14
15 What makes you think that you cannot achieve that with these variables from
16 conf.d/rc
17
18 RC_COLDPLUG
19 RC_HOTPLUG
20 RC_PLUG_SERVICES
21
22 ?
23
24 --
25 Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o>
26 Gentoo/Linux/FreeBSD Developer (baselayout, networking)
27
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list