| 1 |
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all. We have very long delay with m68k arch in many stabilization |
| 3 |
> bugs, especially in perl-related. I think this is not ok. The only one |
| 4 |
> mk68k developer is vapier, so i want say: if we'll have no progress in |
| 5 |
> stabilization for m68k for a two weeks, i'll close all bugs, that have |
| 6 |
> m68k as last arch (i have no hardware to test it) and drop related |
| 7 |
> keyword in package to unstable. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
IIRC we've had discussions in the past about making m68k permanently |
| 10 |
~arch-only, like mips. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Cheers, |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Dirkjan |
Archives