1 |
Absolutely not. The policy is the correct method for numbering |
2 |
versions. Your original understanding of how the policy used versions, |
3 |
and how the kernel developers is incorrect. You could consider the |
4 |
2.4.22_pre kernels as 2.4.21_p kernels... they are patches on top of |
5 |
2.4.21 that will someday in the future become 2.4.22, therefore they're |
6 |
newer. The portage policy is exactly in line with this. |
7 |
|
8 |
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 04:28, Alvaro Figueroa Cabezas wrote: |
9 |
> Ohh I see. Shouldn't the policy be changed to make it the way I |
10 |
> missunderstood it? I really don't see the why in the way it is. |
11 |
-- |
12 |
Chris Gianelloni |
13 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |