Archives
Archives
| From: | cilly <cilly@××××××××××.nu> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked | ||
| Date: | Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:18:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | 6480FBE9-7231-4656-B190-D22A89E8C6B3@cilly.mine.nu | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked by Christian Faulhammer |
||
| 1 | On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:05 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > You have the cvs diff abilites and we have a header that says which |
| 4 | > CVS revision one is having. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Well, who are bugreporters? I'd say a lot of users report bugs who |
| 7 | don't use CVS at all. And they even don't know about the different |
| 8 | CVS-versions. Then a maintainer would have to ask for the CVS |
| 9 | version... takes time, requires additional interaction which could be |
| 10 | prevented, if the ebuild number is unique. |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |